Canada is in the midst of a federal election, and the leaders of the major political parties have taken the stage in a number of televised debates, two in French and the most recent one in English. These debates featured a few memorable bouts of verbal jousting, and the English-language session included an exchange which brought to mind a trademark issue.
You are here
Fred Wu | August 13, 2021
Whether pursued in Ontario or in the United States, litigation begins with an exchange of pleadings. Pleadings serve crucial functions; these court documents define the scope of a dispute and give notice to the other side of what is being argued. If a plaintiff’s pleading—called a Statement of Claim under Ontario civil procedure—fails to effectively describe the allegations supporting the suit, or describes a claim without any basis in law, a defendant need not deliver a responding pleading and press forward.
Injunctions in Franchise Disputes - Part 4: Injunctions and the Duty of Good Faith in Franchising
Idan Erez | July 14, 2021
This is the fourth installment in Hoffer Adler LLP’s continuing Legal Insight Series focusing on injunctions in franchise disputes. For Parts 1, 2 and 3, of this Series, click here, here and here, respectively.
A Sign of the Times: Updated Practices in the Trademarks Opposition Board Look Towards a Post-COVID World
Stephanie Chong | July 11, 2021
In March 2020, all institutions were forced to adapt to the then-novel threat of COVID-19. The Canadian Trademarks Opposition Board was no exception. The Board is an administrative body that acts on behalf of the Registrar of Trademarks with respect to trademark oppositions (a process whereby third parties can oppose an application to register a trademark), and summary cancellations under Section 45 of the Trademarks Act (a process through which third parties can ask to remove a trademark registration from the Register based on non-use of that trademark).
The Use of Financial Performance Representations by Canadian Franchisors – Part II: Earnings Projections
Idan Erez | May 13, 2021
In this ongoing Legal Insight series, we will discuss some of the regulatory requirements and legal issues concerning financial performance representations, or “FPRs” as they are sometimes referred to in the United States.
The Use of Financial Performance Representations by Canadian Franchisors – Part I: Past Historical Data
Idan Erez | May 6, 2021
In this ongoing Legal Insight series, we will discuss some of the regulatory requirements and legal issues concerning the making by Canadian franchisors of financial performance representations, or “FPRs” as they are sometimes referred to in the United States. This installment in the series will focus on the disclosure of past historical data.
What Are Financial Performance Representations?
Stephanie Chong | May 5, 2021
“Faster, Mommy! Faster, faster!” Those words were regularly uttered by my son when he was younger whenever we spent time on a ski hill, at an ice rink, or even just running around the neighbourhood.
Speed demon that he was (and still is), he would no doubt be encouraged by recent measures taken by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) to accelerate the processing of trademark applications.
Stephanie Chong | August 4, 2020
Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all of us command.
Car ton bras sait porter l’épée,
Il sait porter la croix!
Ton histoire est une épopée
Des plus brilliants exploits.
God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
Idan Erez | July 20, 2020
Typically, franchise agreements are written documents that include detailed terms describing the legal rights and obligations of the franchisee and franchisor.
Idan Erez | June 26, 2020
In response to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) suspended all regular operations on March 15, 2020. The suspension included the adjournment of hearings that were already scheduled and a moratorium on requests for new hearings, except for urgent ones.
Urgent hearings were permitted to continue out of recognition that access to justice must always remain available in order to permit the Court to continue to play its fundamental role in our constitutional democracy.